ATP POSITION STATEMENTS
Currently there is no published evidence supporting a link between breastfeeding issues and lip-tie.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) have not issued any guidance on this issue and therefore training is not available in the UK in lip-tie division for practitioners.
This situation may change in the future if new research and evidence influences best practice guidelines. Currently nurse/midwife tongue-tie practitioners working in the UK cannot offer lip-tie division as the Nursing and Midwifery Council’s Code of Conduct states that nurses, midwives and health visitors must ‘deliver care based on the best available evidence or best practice’ and ensure any advice given is evidence based if suggesting healthcare products or services.
The Code also requires that nurses and midwives recognise and work within the limits of their competence. On the rare occasions that lip-ties are divided by surgeons in the NHS it is usually done in relation to concerns about dental issues, not breastfeeding. If you have concerns about lip-ties we suggest you discuss this with your dentist.
This article “Lip Tie – What’s it all about?” was written by our past Chair, Sarah Oakley, for the Association of Breastfeeding Mothers.
Lip-Tie Position statement reviewed by S.Barber on behalf of ATP 03/2024. Original Statement remains current to UK practice.
Disruptive Wound Management (2022)
There is currently no evidence that disruptive wound management prevents recurrence of a restrictive lingual frenulum. The ATP supports their members to make their own individual clinical judgement based on the holistic situation in front of them. See the ATP position statement below.
POSITION STATEMENT
Routine aftercare and wound management following infant frenulotomy.
This statement outlines the current position of the Association of Tongue-Tie Practitioners
(ATP) on the routine management of a post frenulotomy wound site and aftercare in infants.
It refers to a first frenulotomy undertaken on an infant and the routine advice given to parents in the days following frenulotomy.
POSITION STATEMENTS WIDER BACKGROUND and CONTEXT
It is important to take into account aspects of the current clinical practice, published evidence and educational context in which this statement is written.
The ATP committee agree the following:
Footnotes:
Frenulotomy (or division) is the surgical cutting or dividing of the frenulum which is attached to the floor of the mouth and the underside of the tongue. It can be done using scissors or laser.
*This position statement is NOT intended to cover situations whereby there are subsequent individual 'follow. up' appointments with women and babies post first or second frenulotomy (re-division during which a practitioner (rather than the parent) performs interventions on a bespoke basis.
ATP POSITION STATEMENT:
Frenulotomy on an infant is undertaken to improve either breast or bottle feeding. It aims at freeing the tongue that is restricted in its function and movement due to a short frenulum.
The desired result (although not always achieved) is that the freed tongue achieves optimal sucking, which results in more effective feeding.
Frenulotomy has several recognised complications. Two of which throw the spotlight on wound healing and routine aftercare practices. Firstly, wound infection (although theoretical or very low risk due to the properties of saliva and breast milk) and secondly the apparent re-formation, reappearance or 're-growth' of the frenulum after healing which can cause the tongue to become restricted again and the return of feeding difficulties. In some cases, this could then necessitate a second frenulotomy (re-division) needing to be undertaken which is undesirable.
The incidence of 're-growth' and restriction forming as the first frenulotomy heals is difficult to determine but is thought to be in the region of 2-4% (ATP, 2021). With a view to minimise this occurring, there are several post frenulotomy aftercare instructions which are routinely given by practitioners to parents. These are classified below starting with the least intervening and progressing to the most, with many different timings and regimes being suggested to parents.
LEVEL 1
No intervention, feeding the baby as usual.
(Other than observing for any bleeding or signs of infection no other action is taken)
LEVEL 2
Feeding the baby as usual and also encouraging parents to do 'tongue exercises' with the baby
(These exercises might include: Encouraging baby to suck a clean finger and withdraw the finger slowly in a 'tug of war' game; running a clean finger along baby's lower gums to encourage sideways tongue movement; parents)sticking their tongue out at the baby to encourage the baby to mimic the action). These are detailed on the current ATP 'Care After Tongue-Tie Division (Frenulotomy)' leaflet.
LEVEL 3
Encouraging 'tongue lifting'
(The parent is encouraged to insert either one or two of their fore fingers under the baby's tongue, with the finger tips at each side of the wound and lifts the tongue upwards enough to stretch the wound site. Touching the wound site itself is not encouraged. The second way of achieving the tongue lift is on a sleeping baby, pressing down on the baby's chin, thereby moving the lower jaw open and down lowering the floor of the mouth and causing the wound to stretch).
LEVEL 4
Active wound management (AWM) or disruptive wound massage/management (DWM)
(This involves using a clean finger(s) in a 'sweeping', rubbing or circular motion (massaging) across the opened wound site. Sometimes including stretching or opening the wound in addition)
There is currently no published evidence as to which of these LEVELS achieve optimal healing thereby avoiding the need for second frenulotomy (re-division). There is also professional discussion about the acceptability of the different LEVELS, particularly LEVELS 3
and 4 to parents as well as to babies
The key concerns of LEVEL 3 & 4 for parents are:
The key concerns of LEVEL 3 & 4 for babies are:
Mindful of the above, the ATP supports up to classification LEVEL 2 for routine aftercare and wound management following frenulotomy. This care is outlined in the current ATP 'Care After Tongue-Tie Division (Frenulotomy) leaflet.
The ATP bases its position on the following two principles:
ATP APRIL 2022
Position statement on frenulotomy (surgical release of tongue-tie) in different age groups (2024)
Surgical release of tongue-tie can be carried out at any age. However, the procedure undertaken will differ depending on the age of the patient/baby or infant.
Infancy (up to age one year)
In infancy frenulotomy is most usually offered for feeding (breast and/or bottle) difficulties in accordance with NICE Guidance (2005) only after skilled assessment by a registered healthcare professional. Most often the professional is a specialist trained midwife or nurse.
The procedure is deemed to be ‘low risk’. It is performed with the use of scissors. The baby is held securely and scissors are used to cut the frenulum which releases the baby’s tongue to move more freely. This aids optimal sucking and thereby improves feeding. It is performed without anesthetics, either local or general. Pain is considered to be minimal and very short lived. Most infants are thought to experience minimal pain and upset during the procedure.
Infants are fed (either by breast or bottle) immediately following the procedure which comforts the baby and stops any bleeding by bringing the tongue down on the incision site under the tongue. Babies over 8 weeks old can be given oral liquid paracetamol in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions on the bottle, if necessary. Sometimes sucrose is used. A meta-analysis of the research concluded that simple frenulotomy without anesthetic is indicated in infancy and frenuloplasty under general anesthesia provides better results for older children. (Shekher et al, 2021).
Babies aged from 6 months to a year
Babies of this age can still be treated for tongue tie as above. However, the Association of Tongue tie Practitioners’ (ATP) position is that this is dependent on several factors:
Individual practitioners vary in their views on when sedation or anesthesia should be used for babies of this age either before, during or after the procedure. However, there are practitioners in practice who are skilled at performing frenulotomies on babies of this age.
Babies/toddlers (age over one year old)
Babies/toddlers of this age require different considerations and therefore are not usually done by midwives or nurses. Relevant factors include:
For these reasons the ATP takes the position that it is not advised that midwife or nurse tongue-tie practitioners perform frenulotomy on babies over a year old in private practice.
References
Harrison, Denisea; Bueno, Marianae. Translating evidence: pain treatment in newborns, infants, and toddlers during needle-related procedures. PAIN Reports 8(2):p 1-8, March/April 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001064
NICE (2005) Overview | Division of ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) for breastfeeding | Guidance | NICE
Shekher, Rohil MD; Lin, Lawrence MD; Zhang, Rosaline MD; Hoppe, Ian C. MD; Taylor, Jesse A. MD; Bartlett, Scott P. MD; Swanson, Jordan W. MD. How to Treat a Tongue-tie: An Evidence-based Algorithm of Care. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open 9(1):p e3336, January 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003336
Further reading
Prim Auychai, Andreas Neff, Poramate Pitak-Arnnop, Tongue-Tie children with a severe Hazelbaker score or difficult breastfeeding greatly benefit from frenotomy or frenuloplasty with/without anaesthesia – First do or do no harm?, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Volume 123, Issue 3, 2022, Pages e76-e81,ISSN 2468-7855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.09.007.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785521001932)
Trottier ED, Doré-Bergeron MJ, Chauvin-Kimoff L, Baerg K, Ali S. Managing pain and distress in children undergoing brief diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Dec;24(8):509-535. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz026. Epub 2019 Dec 9. PMID: 31844394; PMCID: PMC6901171.
Authors Sarah Oakley and Louise Armstrong, approved at the ATP General Meeting on 7 August 2024.